• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Owed Unpaid Wages?

Information for workers owed unpaid wages.

  • Home
  • About
    • Owed Wages?
    • Anatomy of an Unpaid Wages Lawsuit
    • Scholarship
  • News
    • Food Servers
    • Call Center
    • Minimum Wage
    • Off the Clock Work
    • Tip-Sharing
    • Unpaid Commissions
    • Unpaid Overtime Pay
    • Worker Misclassification
  • FAQs
  • Wage Theft
    • 2017 Wage Theft Report
    • “Off the Clock” Work
    • Donning & Doffing Time
    • Minimum Wage Violations
    • Misclassification of Workers
    • Overtime Pay Violations
    • Payroll Debit Card Fees
    • Suspect Record-Keeping
    • Tip-Sharing Violations
    • Unpaid Meal Breaks
    • Unreimbursed Expenses
  • Industries
    • Call Center Agents
    • Food Processing Workers
    • Hotel Workers
    • Non-Exempt Salaried Workers
    • Nurses & Aides
    • Restaurant Servers
    • Roadside Technicians
    • Telecommuters
    • Truck Drivers
    • Construction Project Supervisors
    • Gas Station Workers
    • Residential Property Managers
    • Private Security Guards
  • Contact
Grubhub wage lawsuit

Feb 22 2018

Grubhub’s Win in California Wage Lawsuit May Embolden Gig Economy Companies to Violate Labor Laws

Employee or independent contractor? That is the question for many around the country who work in the “gig economy” for companies like Uber, Handy, HelloTech, and Zeel. This is an issue the lawyers at the Wage Authority Group must frequently assess, as most federal and state wage-and-hour laws only apply to employees, not independent contractors.

On February 8, 2018, a California court issued one of the first decisions addressing whether a worker in the gig economy—in this case a GrubHub driver–was an employee or independent contractor.

Applying California law, the court found the GrubHub driver to be an independent contractor, based on a variety of factors including:

  • Grubhub did not control how he made the deliveries — whether by car, motorcycle, scooter or bicycle;
  • Grubhub also did not control the driver’s appearance while he was making Grubhub deliveries;
  • The driver was not required to have any Grubhub signage on his car and in fact did not have any such signage;
  • Grubhub did not require the driver to undergo any particular training or orientation;
  • The driver also worked for other gig economy companies, including Lyft, Uber and another meal delivery service, Postmates.
  • The driver drove for these companies, including Grubhub, because the flexible scheduling allowed him to pursue his acting career.

The court noted that some factors weighed in favor of the driver being an employee, including the fact that the job required no special skills and that the delivery service was part of GrubHub’s regular business.

Nonetheless, the judge concluded that “While some factors weigh in favor of an employment relationship, Grubhub’s lack of all necessary control over [the driver’s] work, including how he performed deliveries and even whether or for how long, along with other factors persuade the Court that the contractor classification was appropriate.”

The court’s ruling does not apply to the gig economy as a whole, but some company’s may take it that way, and attempt to classify workers as independent contractors even when they exert far more control over them than Grubhub does over its drivers.

The legal landscape is evolving. The California Supreme Court is considering adopting a more protective test for employee status. One test the court may adopt is New Jersey’s so-called ABC test, which presumes workers are employees unless a business can show a worker is free from its supervision, works outside the usual course or place of business, and works “in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.”

Unfortunately, there is no app that tells gig economy workers whether they are protected under applicable labor laws. If you are interested in learning more, stay tuned for continuing coverage of these issues here at OwedUnpaidWages, and always feel free to contact the attorneys at the Wage Authority Group.

Written by Wage Authority Group · Categorized: Food Delivery, Worker Misclassification

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Questions? Get Answers

Call: 1-877-739-1127

Or Complete the Following Form:

News

  • U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Auto Service Advisers In Overtime Lawsuit
  • Lyft Drivers Score Big Settlement As Gig Economy Wage & Hour Lawsuits Continue To Soar
  • Arizona Restaurant Chain Sued for Unpaid Wages
  • Gov’t Employees Sue Cuyahoga County for Unpaid Overtime
  • DOL: Alabama Security Company Withheld Millions in Wages

248-746-4057 Wage Authority Group / Terms ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

© Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved.